JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II. Read the opinion of the Court — 508 S.W.3d 391
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 31, 2012·No. 02-11-00373-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00373-CV

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. APPELLANT

V.

PROFESSIONAL PHARMACY II APPELLEES AND CAMBRIDGE GORBUTT MOB, L.P.

------------

FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered “Appellant's Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal As To

Cambridge Only.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted;

therefore, we dismiss the appeal of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as to appellee

Cambridge Gorbutt MOB, L.P. only. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

This case shall hereafter be styled “JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional

Pharmacy II.”

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same as

between appellant and appellee Cambridge Gorbutt MOB, L.P., for which let

execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 31, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.