JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00373-CV
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. APPELLANT
V.
PROFESSIONAL PHARMACY II APPELLEES AND CAMBRIDGE GORBUTT MOB, L.P.
------------
FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered “Appellant's Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal As To
Cambridge Only.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted;
therefore, we dismiss the appeal of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as to appellee
Cambridge Gorbutt MOB, L.P. only. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
This case shall hereafter be styled “JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional
Pharmacy II.”
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same as
between appellant and appellee Cambridge Gorbutt MOB, L.P., for which let
execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: May 31, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.