JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL, N.A. v. WILLIAM E. WHITAKER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF N.R. HINES
This text of JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL, N.A. v. WILLIAM E. WHITAKER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF N.R. HINES (JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL, N.A. v. WILLIAM E. WHITAKER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF N.R. HINES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 29, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24A1259. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL, N. A. v. WILLIAM E. WHITAKER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF N. R. HINES, et al.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A. (“the Bank”), as the successor in interest to Washington Mutual, N. A. filed suit against the estate of N. R. Hines and Hines’s heirs (collectively, “the Hineses”), seeking reformation of a loan agreement and security deed. The Hineses moved for summary judgment, arguing that the statute of limitation had expired on the Bank’s claim for reformation. The trial court agreed and on June 27, 2023, it entered an order granting the motion for summary judgment. On October 27, 2023, the Bank filed a notice of appeal. The Hineses have moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that this Court lacks jurisdiction. We agree.
A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.” Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012) (punctuation omitted). Here, the Bank’s notice of appeal was untimely, as it was filed four months after entry of the trial court’s order. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. For that reason, the Hineses’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. To the extent that the trial court did not provide the Bank with timely notice of its June 27, 2023 order, the Bank’s remedy is to petition the trial court to vacate and re-enter the order as a means of correcting the problem. Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d 426) (1980), disapproved in part on other grounds by Wright v. Young, 297 Ga. 683, 684 n. 3 (777 SE2d 475) (2015).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/29/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL, N.A. v. WILLIAM E. WHITAKER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF N.R. HINES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jpmorgan-chase-bank-na-successor-by-merger-to-washington-mutual-na-v-gactapp-2024.