JPG Enterprises, Inc. v. Hampson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

JPG Enterprises, Inc. v. Hampson

764 So. 2d 605, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5705, 1999 WL 270403

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1999

DocketNos. 97-3276, 98-0311

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 So. 2d 605 (JPG Enterprises, Inc. v. Hampson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JPG Enterprises, Inc. v. Hampson, 764 So. 2d 605, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5705, 1999 WL 270403 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment, entered following a non-jury trial, is affirmed. We do not interpret paragraph 24 of the parties’ contract as precluding the trial court’s award of a set-off to Appellees. Appellees may set-off the cost of correcting substantial construction defects against Appellant’s contract damages for its substantial completion of the contract to build a home on Appellees’ property. See generally, Casa Linda Tile & Marble Installers, Inc. v. Highlands Place 1981, Ltd., 642 So.2d 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So.2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s finding that Appellees are the prevailing party notwithstanding the award to Appellant of a net $281.20 judgment. See Prosperi v. Code, Inc., 626 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993).

The awards on both the claim and the set-off are supported by the record. As to all other issues, we also affirm.

STONE, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment, entered following a non-jury trial, is affirmed. We do not interpret paragraph 24 of the parties’ contract as precluding the trial court’s award of a set-off to Appellees. Appellees may set-off the cost of correcting substantial construction defects against Appellant’s contract damages for its substantial completion of the contract to build a home on Appellees’ property. See generally, Casa Linda Tile & Marble Installers, Inc. v. Highlands Place 1981, Ltd., 642 So.2d 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So.2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s finding that Appellees are the prevailing party notwithstanding the award to Appellant of a net $281.20 judgment. See Prosperi v. Code, Inc., 626 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993).

The awards on both the claim and the set-off are supported by the record. As to all other issues, we also affirm.

STONE, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 So. 2d 605, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5705, 1999 WL 270403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jpg-enterprises-inc-v-hampson-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack