Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/J.P. v. State

J.P. v. State

53 So. 3d 368, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 531
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.P. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7607 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2011·No. No. 3D10-1406·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Zaldivar, 34 So.3d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Prestley v. State, 896 So.2d 862, 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“Occupants of a private vehicle are traveling together by choice and thus may be assumed to have some personal or business association with one another. Knowledge or suspicion that one of the occupants has been involved in criminal activity occurring within the car, or involving the car itself, serves as a basis for a reasonable suspicion that the other occupants may be participants in that activity. Therefore, we conclude that since the officers had a reasonable suspicion that the car was stolen, they had a basis for stopping and questioning the passengers in the vehicle, including the Juvenile.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.P. v. State, 53 So. 3d 368, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

53 So. 3d 368 (J.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Zaldivar
34 So. 3d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Prestley v. State
896 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)