JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart
180 A.3d 367
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 22, 2018
Docket428 EAL 2017 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 180 A.3d 367 (JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart, 180 A.3d 367 (Pa. 2018).
Opinion
AND NOW, this 22 nd day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:
Whether a lender/mortgagee whose first complaint in mortgage foreclosure against a borrower/mortgagor was dismissed is required to send a new Notice of Intention to Foreclose pursuant to 41 P.S. § 403(a) (Act 6 Notice) prior to filing a second complaint in mortgage foreclosure.
Petitioner's Application to Amend Pleading is also GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taggart, K. v. JP Morgan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Taggart, K., Aplt.
203 A.3d 187 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 A.3d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jp-morgan-chase-bank-na-v-taggart-pa-2018.