JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart

180 A.3d 367

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 22, 2018·No. 428 EAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 22 ^nd day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Whether a lender/mortgagee whose first complaint in mortgage foreclosure against a borrower/mortgagor was dismissed is required to send a new Notice of Intention to Foreclose pursuant to 41 P.S. § 403(a) (Act 6 Notice) prior to filing a second complaint in mortgage foreclosure.

Petitioner's Application to Amend Pleading is also GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 22 ^nd day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue, rephrased for clarity:

Whether a lender/mortgagee whose first complaint in mortgage foreclosure against a borrower/mortgagor was dismissed is required to send a new Notice of Intention to Foreclose pursuant to 41 P.S. § 403(a) (Act 6 Notice) prior to filing a second complaint in mortgage foreclosure.

Petitioner's Application to Amend Pleading is also GRANTED.

JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart, 180 A.3d 367 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

180 A.3d 367 (JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Taggart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related