JP Miorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Ryans
This text of JP Miorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Ryans (JP Miorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Ryans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, . NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : ID No. 09L-06-078 NEP In and For Kent County PLAINTIFF, v. IRIS R. RYANS DEFENDANT.
Subrnitted: March 23, 2018 Decided: March 28, 2018
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant Iris R. Ryans’s (hereinai°cer “Defendant”)
Motion to Set Aside Judgment.
The facts briefly are as follows. On June 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed a complaint
against Defendant seeking foreclosure of Plaintiff’ s interest in 7 Ashby Lane, Dover,
Delaware 19904. On July 8, 2009, a Sheriff’ s Return Was filed With this Court in
Which Sheriff J im Higdon attested that a copy of Writ of summons Was personally
served upon Defendant on July 7, 2009. Default Judgment Was entered in Plaintiff’ s
favor on August 2, 2010 (hereinafcer the “Judgment”).
Defendant’s only arguments here for Setting aside the Judgment are that she
never received a summons, and that Mr. Higdon, the sheriff, “Was untrustworthy to
sign a sherist return.”
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nationa/ Association v. lris R. Ryans 09L-06-078 NEP March 28, 2018
Under Superior Court Civil Rule 60, the Court shall set aside a judgment if the movant demonstrates that the judgment is void. Default judgments may be considered void Where proper service was never affected upon the defendant.l “In Delaware, a sherist return is “prima facie proof of proper service.”2 “Strong and convincing proof is required to rebut the presumption of its verity.”3 Here, Defendant has presented no proof or evidence Whatsoever to rebut the presumption of proper service. At the hearing held on March 23, 2018, With regards to this matter, Ms. Ryans made ad hominem attacks against Mr. Higdon, and repeated her claim that she never received a summons. The Court finds that Defendant Was properly served,
and she puts forth no other grounds for setting aside the Judgment.
WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s motion to set aside the
judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Noel Eason Primos Judge NEP/st
Via File&ServeXpress & U.S. Maz`l oc. Prothonotary cc. Iris Ryans
Daniel Conway, Esquire
1Keith v. Melvin L. Joseph Const. Co., 451 A.2d 842, 845 (Del. Super. 1982). 2 Alston v. Dipasquale, 2001 WL 34083824, at *l (Del. Super. Oct. 19, 2001). 3 Cohen v. Brana'ywine Raceway Ass'n, 238 A.2d 320, 324 (Del. Super. 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JP Miorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Ryans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jp-miorgan-chase-bank-national-association-v-ryans-delsuperct-2018.