Jozu Enterprises, Inc. v. Muller

400 So. 2d 831, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20496
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1981·No. No. 80-2276·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for relief from judgment presented pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(4) on the ground that the judgment was void because it affirmatively appears that the allegations in the ad damnum clause were insufficient to confer jurisdiction on the circuit court to enter a judgment of possession. § 34.-011(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); Williams v. Gund, 334 So.2d 314 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.110(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jozu Enterprises, Inc. v. Muller, 400 So. 2d 831, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

400 So. 2d 831 (Jozu Enterprises, Inc. v. Muller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baldwin Sod Farms, Inc. v. Corrigan
746 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)