Joyner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Joyner v. United States

819 A.2d 320, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 144, 2003 WL 1558200

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2003

DocketNo. 97-CF-771, 97-CO-1621 and 99-CO-1661

StatusPublished

This text of 819 A.2d 320 (Joyner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joyner v. United States, 819 A.2d 320, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 144, 2003 WL 1558200 (D.C. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s unopposed motion to reissue judgment, and appellant’s pro se motion to recall the mandate, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s motion to reissue judgment is granted. The mandate issued on August 30, 2002 is hereby-recalled and the opinion and judgment of August 8, 2002, hereby vacated, to be reissued this date. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s pro se motion to recall the mandate is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s unopposed motion to reissue judgment, and appellant’s pro se motion to recall the mandate, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s motion to reissue judgment is granted. The mandate issued on August 30, 2002 is hereby-recalled and the opinion and judgment of August 8, 2002, hereby vacated, to be reissued this date. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s pro se motion to recall the mandate is denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

819 A.2d 320, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 144, 2003 WL 1558200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyner-v-united-states-dc-2003.