Joyner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Joyner v. State

26 S.W.2d 1118

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 16, 1930·No. No. 1326·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction is for possessing mash for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The state’s attorney before this court has called our attention to the fact that the statement of facts was filed too late and moves, to strike it out. The motion is well taken.

The indictment is correct and in form, and is followed by the charge of the court, judgment, and sentence.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction is for possessing mash for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The state’s attorney before this court has called our attention to the fact that the statement of facts was filed too late and moves, to strike it out. The motion is well taken.

The indictment is correct and in form, and is followed by the charge of the court, judgment, and sentence.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Joyner v. State, 26 S.W.2d 1118 (Tex. 1930).

Pincite

26 S.W.2d 1118 (Joyner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.