Joyner v. State

862 So. 2d 785, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17369, 2003 WL 22681568
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 2003·No. No. 2D02-5709·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm David Joyner’s judgment and sentence for handling and fondling a child under the age of sixteen years. However, we note that a scrivener’s error appears on the order revoking his probation which states that Joyner violated condition two of his probation rather than condition three. Accordingly, we remand for correction of the order.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joyner v. State, 862 So. 2d 785, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17369, 2003 WL 22681568 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

862 So. 2d 785 (Joyner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nomo Research, Inc. v. CCL Plastic Packaging, Inc.
862 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)