Joyner v. State
This text of 594 So. 2d 328 (Joyner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lester JOYNER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*329 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
CASE, JAMES R., Associate Judge.
We affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence upon his violation of community control.
We need not and do not address the defendant's argument that he should not have been sentenced to community control after having been declared a habitual offender. The record on appeal does not indicate that the defendant objected to the community control sentence when it was imposed nor did he timely appeal that sentence thereafter. His acceptance of community control constituted a waiver of the right to attack that community control at revocation. See Thompson v. State, 591 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Wolfson v. State, 437 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 So. 2d 328, 1992 WL 29045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyner-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.