Joyner v. State
325 So. 2d 404, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4452
Opinion
Certiorari was granted in this cause because of apparent conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, 303 So.2d 60, and the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Laiser v. State, 299 So.2d 39 (Fla.App. 4th 1974). Since the granting of this writ, the District Court’s decision in Laiser, supra, has been quashed by this Court in State v. Laiser, 322 So.2d 490 (Fla.1975).
Accordingly, conflict having been dispelled, the writ heretofore issued is discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joyner v. State, 325 So. 2d 404, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4452 (Fla. 1976).
325 So. 2d 404 (Joyner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hamilton
660 So. 2d 1038 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Menendez v. State
521 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Korreckt v. State
507 So. 2d 558 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Simmons v. State
491 So. 2d 1307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
West v. State
439 So. 2d 907 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
State v. Haugee
402 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Weisenford v. State
333 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)