Joyner v. Sheriff Department

Fourth Circuit

Joyner v. Sheriff Department

669 F. App'x 147

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2016·No. No. 16-6750·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Joyner, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and to reconsider the court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Sheriff Dep’t, No. 1:16-cv-00091-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 27, 2016 & entered Apr. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Joyner, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and to reconsider the court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Sheriff Dep’t, No. 1:16-cv-00091-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 27, 2016 & entered Apr. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Joyner v. Sheriff Department, 669 F. App'x 147 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 147 (Joyner v. Sheriff Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related