Joyner v. Redmond

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Joyner v. Redmond

232 S.E.2d 637, 141 Ga. App. 121, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1792

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1977·No. 53304·Published

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

1. In the trial of this rear-end collision tort case, the trial judge did not err in refusing to allow the plaintiffs’ counsel to cross examine witness James K. Bohannon with regard to a signed statement made by the witness in the plaintiffs’ counsel’s possession where it appeared that the plaintiff husband had previously answered an interrogatory, stating he had no statements made by this witness in his possession. Code Ann. § 38-114.

2. The plaintiffs’ remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stolz, Judge.

1. In the trial of this rear-end collision tort case, the trial judge did not err in refusing to allow the plaintiffs’ counsel to cross examine witness James K. Bohannon with regard to a signed statement made by the witness in the plaintiffs’ counsel’s possession where it appeared that the plaintiff husband had previously answered an interrogatory, stating he had no statements made by this witness in his possession. Code Ann. § 38-114.

2. The plaintiffs’ remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Joyner v. Redmond, 232 S.E.2d 637, 141 Ga. App. 121, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

232 S.E.2d 637 (Joyner v. Redmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.