Joyner v. Joyner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Joyner v. Joyner

491 S.W.3d 667, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 2016 WL 3267884

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 14, 2016

DocketWD 79142

StatusPublished

This text of 491 S.W.3d 667 (Joyner v. Joyner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joyner v. Joyner, 491 S.W.3d 667, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 2016 WL 3267884 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Jennifer Joyner appeals a judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage. Ms. Joyner and Mr. Christopher E. Joyner were married for almost eight years and had no children. , Ms. Joyner claims that the trial court misapplied- the law in failing to award maintenance and that the award was not supported by substantial evidence .and was, against the weight of the: evidence.

For reasons stated-in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Jennifer Joyner appeals a judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage. Ms. Joyner and Mr. Christopher E. Joyner were married for almost eight years and had no children. , Ms. Joyner claims that the trial court misapplied- the law in failing to award maintenance and that the award was not supported by substantial evidence .and was, against the weight of the: evidence.

For reasons stated-in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

491 S.W.3d 667, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 2016 WL 3267884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyner-v-joyner-moctapp-2016.