Joyner v. Broadmar Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joyner v. Broadmar Realty Corp.

254 A.D. 571, 2 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6604

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 571 (Joyner v. Broadmar Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joyner v. Broadmar Realty Corp., 254 A.D. 571, 2 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant when plaintiff fell into a ditch excavated at the defendant’s direction in an alleyway in the rear of, and appurtenant to, a store demised by the defendant to the plaintiff, which store was one of five in the same building. The right to use the alleyway was common to the store tenants, including the plaintiff. Prom a judgment entered upon the verdict for $500 in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant and plaintiff separately appeal, the latter only on the ground of the claimed inadequacy of the verdict. Upon the argument the plaintiff’s appeal was in effect withdrawn. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent-appellant. (Sciolaro v. Asch, 198 N. Y. 77, 81; Hirsch v. Radt, 228 id. 100, 104; Dollard v. Roberts, 130 id. 269, 273; Hicks v. Smith, 158 App. Div. 299.) Appeal by plaintiff dismissed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant when plaintiff fell into a ditch excavated at the defendant’s direction in an alleyway in the rear of, and appurtenant to, a store demised by the defendant to the plaintiff, which store was one of five in the same building. The right to use the alleyway was common to the store tenants, including the plaintiff. Prom a judgment entered upon the verdict for $500 in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant and plaintiff separately appeal, the latter only on the ground of the claimed inadequacy of the verdict. Upon the argument the plaintiff’s appeal was in effect withdrawn. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent-appellant. (Sciolaro v. Asch, 198 N. Y. 77, 81; Hirsch v. Radt, 228 id. 100, 104; Dollard v. Roberts, 130 id. 269, 273; Hicks v. Smith, 158 App. Div. 299.) Appeal by plaintiff dismissed. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 571, 2 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyner-v-broadmar-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack