Joycelyn Middleton v. State
This text of Joycelyn Middleton v. State (Joycelyn Middleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-16-00221-CR
JOYCELYN MIDDLETON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1600213
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER
Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as
that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security
number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.”
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10 (a)(1). Volume six of the reporter’s record includes appellant’s social security
number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with
the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP.
P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume
six of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee,
in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal volume six of the electronically filed reporter’s record in
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: July 31, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joycelyn Middleton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joycelyn-middleton-v-state-texapp-2017.