Joyce v. . Williams

1 N.C. 119
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1799·Published

Opinions

This was an action of assumpsit, founded on a written promise of indemnity made under the following circumstances: The plaintiff was sheriff of Rockingham County when a writ of fieri facias against the property of Nathaniel Williams came to his hands, upon which he made a levy and appointed the day of sale. The plaintiff, who had been but a short time in office and was but imperfectly acquainted with its duties, was told by the present defendant, who was an attorney, and brother to the defendant in execution, that a sale could not legally take place unless three actual bidders were present; and was likewise warned by him of the consequences of knocking down the property, unless to a third bidder. This induced the plaintiff to apply to the defendant for his advice professionally, and he then repeated the same information; and that the plaintiff might entertain no doubt of its truth, and to induce him to conduct the sale accordingly, he promised to indemnify him *Page 113 against all damages he might receive in consequence of discontinuing the sale, in case there should not be three bidders.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joyce v. . Williams, 1 N.C. 119 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

1 N.C. 119 (Joyce v. . Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.