Joyce v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Joyce v. Pearce

641 P.2d 1170, 56 Or. App. 398, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2693

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 15, 1982

DocketNo. 18-326, CA A21408

StatusPublished

This text of 641 P.2d 1170 (Joyce v. Pearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joyce v. Pearce, 641 P.2d 1170, 56 Or. App. 398, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2693 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a quiet title proceeding in which the trial court quieted title to the property in question in defendants. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning as error, inter alia, the trial court’s failure to award them $848.11, together with interest thereon, from defendants in repayment of certain taxes paid on the disputed property. The defendants concede that they are obligated to repay to plaintiffs a prorated sum, the exact amount of which they do not acknowledge. In light of defendants’ concession, the decree is reversed as to that matter only, and the cause is remanded with instructions to award plaintiffs a prorated sum as restitution for monies expended in paying taxes on the property, the exact amount of said award to be computed by the trial court. In all other respects, the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a quiet title proceeding in which the trial court quieted title to the property in question in defendants. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning as error, inter alia, the trial court’s failure to award them $848.11, together with interest thereon, from defendants in repayment of certain taxes paid on the disputed property. The defendants concede that they are obligated to repay to plaintiffs a prorated sum, the exact amount of which they do not acknowledge. In light of defendants’ concession, the decree is reversed as to that matter only, and the cause is remanded with instructions to award plaintiffs a prorated sum as restitution for monies expended in paying taxes on the property, the exact amount of said award to be computed by the trial court. In all other respects, the decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 P.2d 1170, 56 Or. App. 398, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyce-v-pearce-orctapp-1982.