Joyce v. Joyce

5 Cal. 449
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1855·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., concurred.

This was a judgment and decree by default in a suit for divorce.

The record has a certificate of service of the complaint, on the defendant, in Humboldt County, signed by “J. 0. Butler, Under-Sheriff.” This is insufficient to prove service. It is only by virtue of his official position, that the return of the Sheriff is conclusive, and of such, the Courts must take judicial notice. But the Courts cannot know an under-sheriff, and the act and return of a deputy is a nullity unless done in the name, and by the authority, of the Sheriff.

The record, therefore, does not show that the defendant was brought into Court by service, and for this reason the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joyce v. Joyce, 5 Cal. 449 (Cal. 1855).

5 Cal. 449 (Joyce v. Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Le Doux
102 P. 517 (California Supreme Court, 1909)
Jordan v. McDonnell
44 So. 101 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)
Fee v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad
58 Mo. App. 90 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
Gibbens v. Pickett
31 Fla. 147 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
Reinhart v. Lugo
24 P. 1089 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Palmer v. McMaster
8 Mont. 186 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
Barber v. Briscoe
8 Mont. 214 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
Wilkins v. Tourtellott
28 Kan. 825 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)
Treadway v. Schnauber
1 Dakota 236 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1875)
Kidd v. Four-Twenty Mining Co.
3 Nev. 381 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1867)
Rowley v. Howard
23 Cal. 401 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
McMillan v. Reynolds
11 Cal. 372 (California Supreme Court, 1858)