Joyce v. Harding
This text of 69 N.E. 747 (Joyce v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
This writ of error presents for our review a decree of the circuit court of Cook county, entered on March 3, 1900, dismissing a bill in chancery for want of equity and awarding costs against complainants. Several errors are assigned. The only one relied upon is based on the statement that Michael Smith, one of the complainants, died prior to the date of the entry of the decree in the circuit court. This fact does not appear by the record of that court. It is shown by an affidavit filed in this court. Plaintiff in error should have applied to the circuit court for the relief he seeks. (Life Association of America v. Fassett, 102 Ill. 315; Claflin v. Dunne, 129 id. 241.) Attention is called to the fact that these cases cited were both suits at law. The rule in equity must be the same. This is a court of review. We cannot consider affidavits filed in this court for the purpose of determining whether or not some fact exists which will show that the court below erred.
The decree of the circuit court will be affirmed.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 N.E. 747, 208 Ill. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyce-v-harding-ill-1904.