Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
This text of 239 A.D. 836 (Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting defendant’s motion to strike case from the calendar reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The mistake made by the plaintiff’s attorneys in the note of issue was one which may be corrected under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act and the note of issue amended accordingly, since it clearly did not prejudice any substantial right of the defendant. (Gair v. Birmingham, 15 N. Y. Supp. 147 [not officially published]; Clinton v. Myers, 43 How. Pr. 95.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyce-v-daily-mirror-inc-nyappdiv-1933.