Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.

239 A.D. 836

This text of 239 A.D. 836 (Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc., 239 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to strike case from the calendar reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The mistake made by the plaintiff’s attorneys in the note of issue was one which may be corrected under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act and the note of issue amended accordingly, since it clearly did not prejudice any substantial right of the defendant. (Gair v. Birmingham, 15 N. Y. Supp. 147 [not officially published]; Clinton v. Myers, 43 How. Pr. 95.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clinton v. Myers
43 How. Pr. 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
Gair v. Birmingham
15 N.Y.S. 147 (Superior Court of New York, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyce-v-daily-mirror-inc-nyappdiv-1933.