Joy v. Superior Court

298 A.2d 315, 1972 Del. LEXIS 317
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedNovember 13, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 298 A.2d 315 (Joy v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joy v. Superior Court, 298 A.2d 315, 1972 Del. LEXIS 317 (Del. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dale F. Joy has appealed from the denial by the Superior Court of his petition for a writ of prohibition or, in the alternative, for a writ of mandamus. He was arrested on May 16, 1972, upon a charge of possession of certain drugs, a felony. On the same day, a preliminary hearing was held before a Justice of the Peace, who made a finding of probable cause for the accusation, and ordered Joy held for the Superior Court. Within a day or two thereafter, Joy filed his petition in Superior Court; it was denied on May 25, 1972. Meanwhile, on May 19, 1972, the appellant was indicted by the Grand Jury.

Appellant contends that the preliminary hearing was improperly conducted in that the evidence identifying the drug was purely hearsay.

It is quite clear that an indictment for a felony by the Grand Jury eliminates the need for a preliminary hearing. United States ex rel. Kassin v. Mulligan, 295 U.S. 396, 55 S.Ct. 781, 79 L.Ed. 1501 (1935). The indictment itself is in effect a finding of probable cause. Webb v. Commonwealth, 204 Va. 24, 129 S.E.2d 22 (1963). After the return of a True Bill, the Superior Court’s jurisdiction is no longer predicated upon the decision of the Justice of the Peace; it is founded upon the indictment. For this reason, the propriety of the Magistrate’s decision is moot, and any ruling by us upon the legal question raised could have no effect upon this case. This is not a case of undue delay in the preliminary hearing until after indictment. Compare State v. Wahl, Del.Supr., 263 A. 2d 297, 302 (1970).

The appeal will accordingly be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Grzybowski
Superior Court of Delaware, 2025
Shaw v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware, 2024
State v. Ponzo
Superior Court of Delaware, 2023
Quill v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware, 2014
State of Delaware v. Thelinous Love
Delaware Court of Common Pleas, 2014
Holder v. State
692 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1997)
State v. Robinson
417 A.2d 953 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1980)
Schramm v. State
366 A.2d 1185 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1976)
Smith v. State
344 A.2d 251 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1975)
Pierson v. State
311 A.2d 854 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1973)
Jenkins v. State
305 A.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 A.2d 315, 1972 Del. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joy-v-superior-court-del-1972.