Joy Thompson v. W3 Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Inspection and Consulting Services, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 12, 2016
Docket13-16-00345-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joy Thompson v. W3 Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Inspection and Consulting Services, Inc. (Joy Thompson v. W3 Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Inspection and Consulting Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joy Thompson v. W3 Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Inspection and Consulting Services, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00345-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOY THOMPSON, Appellant,

v.

W3 ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A INSPECTION AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., Appellee.

On appeal from the 156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s unopposed motion to

abate or alternative first motion to extend time to file brief. Appellant’s motion states the

parties have reached a tentative agreement to settle the case which would moot this appeal; however the parties anticipate they will not be able to complete the paperwork to

finalize the settlement until September 1, 2016. Appellant requests this Court abate the

appeal to finalize the settlement.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the

unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal to finalize

settlement should be granted. The motion to abate the appeal pending settlement is

GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until September 1, 2016. Appellant’s

motion in the alternative to extend the briefing deadline is, accordingly, DISMISSED AS

MOOT.

The Court directs appellant to file, on or before September 1, 2016, either (1) a

motion to reinstate the appeal, accompanied by appellant’s brief in this matter, or (2) a

motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 12th day of August, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joy Thompson v. W3 Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Inspection and Consulting Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joy-thompson-v-w3-enterprises-inc-dba-inspection-and-consulting-texapp-2016.