Joy Builders, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Joy Builders, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance

19 Misc. 2d 786, 193 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2933

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 2, 1959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There are triable issues of fact. The insured’s failure to obtain or seek the prior consent of the disclaiming insurers is not, as a matter of law, a bar to recovery of the sum expended in settlement of the claim. Plaintiff would be entitled to reimbursement upon showing that the amount paid was reasonable under the circumstances and that the insurers had breached their contract by improperly withdrawing from the defense of the action (Mayor, Lane & Co. v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co., 169 App. Div. 772; Empire Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bogart, 13 Misc 2d 1094; see, also, Berger Bros. Elec. Motors v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 267 App. Div. 333, 340, revd. on other grounds 293 N. Y. 523).

The order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order granting defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment in part unanimously should be reversed, without costs, and motion denied.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There are triable issues of fact. The insured’s failure to obtain or seek the prior consent of the disclaiming insurers is not, as a matter of law, a bar to recovery of the sum expended in settlement of the claim. Plaintiff would be entitled to reimbursement upon showing that the amount paid was reasonable under the circumstances and that the insurers had breached their contract by improperly withdrawing from the defense of the action (Mayor, Lane & Co. v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co., 169 App. Div. 772; Empire Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bogart, 13 Misc 2d 1094; see, also, Berger Bros. Elec. Motors v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 267 App. Div. 333, 340, revd. on other grounds 293 N. Y. 523).

The order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order granting defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment in part unanimously should be reversed, without costs, and motion denied.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.

Joy Builders, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance, 19 Misc. 2d 786, 193 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

19 Misc. 2d 786 (Joy Builders, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related