Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program
This text of Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program (Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 19, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0141 Lower Tribunal Nos. 2001904976, 13230020231FC ________________
Jovens Bob Angilot, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program.
Jovens Bob Angilot, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER and GORDO, JJ.
GORDO, J. Jovens Bob Angilot (the “Father”) appeals a final administrative
support order entered by the Department of Revenue, Child Support
Program (the “Department”). We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P.
9.030(b)(1)(C), 9.110(a)(2). Finding no error in the Department’s
determination of support, we affirm.
We review an administrative child support order for competent
substantial evidence supporting the agency’s findings of fact. See City of
Lake Wales v. Pub. Emps. Rels. Comm’n, 402 So. 2d 1224, 1225 (Fla. 2d
DCA 1981); see also § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. The Father argues his income
was incorrectly determined. 1 The Father failed to participate in the
administrative proceedings, failed to provide any information or request a
hearing, and has therefore waived the arguments he now makes on appeal
for the first time. See Standard v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support
Enf’t Program, 249 So. 3d 798, 798-99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (“Because
Appellant failed to participate in the administrative proceedings by returning
the forms for financial information supplied him by the Department and failed
1 Because the Father did not participate in the proceedings below, visitation and time-sharing were not considered. If the Father now has a visitation agreement with the child’s mother, his remedy is to seek a modification through the Department of Revenue as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes, or he may seek a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes.
2 to request an administrative hearing after notice of his right to do so and the
consequences for failing to do so, Appellant has not preserved any issue for
this Court’s appellate review. By waiving his right to a hearing, Appellant
waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the
Department’s determination of his child support obligations.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jovens-bob-angilot-v-state-of-florida-department-of-revenue-child-fladistctapp-2024.