Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 2024
Docket2024-0141
StatusPublished

This text of Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program (Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 19, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0141 Lower Tribunal Nos. 2001904976, 13230020231FC ________________

Jovens Bob Angilot, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program.

Jovens Bob Angilot, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Department of Revenue.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER and GORDO, JJ.

GORDO, J. Jovens Bob Angilot (the “Father”) appeals a final administrative

support order entered by the Department of Revenue, Child Support

Program (the “Department”). We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P.

9.030(b)(1)(C), 9.110(a)(2). Finding no error in the Department’s

determination of support, we affirm.

We review an administrative child support order for competent

substantial evidence supporting the agency’s findings of fact. See City of

Lake Wales v. Pub. Emps. Rels. Comm’n, 402 So. 2d 1224, 1225 (Fla. 2d

DCA 1981); see also § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. The Father argues his income

was incorrectly determined. 1 The Father failed to participate in the

administrative proceedings, failed to provide any information or request a

hearing, and has therefore waived the arguments he now makes on appeal

for the first time. See Standard v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support

Enf’t Program, 249 So. 3d 798, 798-99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (“Because

Appellant failed to participate in the administrative proceedings by returning

the forms for financial information supplied him by the Department and failed

1 Because the Father did not participate in the proceedings below, visitation and time-sharing were not considered. If the Father now has a visitation agreement with the child’s mother, his remedy is to seek a modification through the Department of Revenue as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes, or he may seek a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes.

2 to request an administrative hearing after notice of his right to do so and the

consequences for failing to do so, Appellant has not preserved any issue for

this Court’s appellate review. By waiving his right to a hearing, Appellant

waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the

Department’s determination of his child support obligations.”).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel Albert Standard v. State, Department of Revenue, etc.
249 So. 3d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
City of Lake Wales v. Public Employees Relations Commission
402 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jovens Bob Angilot v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jovens-bob-angilot-v-state-of-florida-department-of-revenue-child-fladistctapp-2024.