Jovan'z Smith v. Ken Clark
804 F.3d 983, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18335, 2015 WL 6387862
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 14-15162·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge FLETCHER; Concurrence by Judge CALLAHAN and Judge M. SMITH.
ORDER
A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The sua sponte en banc call is rejected. Judge Fletcher’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc and Judge Callahan and Judge Smith’s concurrence in denial of rehearing en banc are filed concurrently with this Order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jovan'z Smith v. Ken Clark, 804 F.3d 983, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18335, 2015 WL 6387862 (9th Cir. 2015).
804 F.3d 983 (Jovan'z Smith v. Ken Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
(SS) Cervantes v. Commissioner of Social Security
E.D. California, 2024
United States v. Cruz
333 F. Supp. 3d 1045 (D. Montana, 2018)
People v. Torres
California Court of Appeal, 2018
People v. Torres
235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 478 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles
270 F. Supp. 3d 1163 (C.D. California, 2017)
United States v. Howard
156 F. Supp. 3d 1045 (N.D. California, 2016)