Jova Realty Corp. v. Twelve Four Corp.
483 So. 2d 879, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 563, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628
Opinion
Because there are genuine issues as to the liability of the appellee-purchasers for interference with the relationship between the appellant-real estate brokers and the seller, see Brandenburg Investment Corp. v. Farrell Realty, Inc., 463 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 200 So.2d 813 (Fla.1967), the summary judgment entered below is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jova Realty Corp. v. Twelve Four Corp., 483 So. 2d 879, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 563, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
483 So. 2d 879 (Jova Realty Corp. v. Twelve Four Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brandenburg Inv. Corp. v. Farrell Realty
463 So. 2d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mead Corporation v. Mason
191 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)