Journigan v. Warden
This text of 213 A.2d 578 (Journigan v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons stated by Judge Powers in the lower court in his memorandum and order of February 25, 1964, the application of Haywood Earl Journigan for leave to appeal from the order denying' him post conviction relief from imprisonment for robbery with a deadly weapon is hereby denied.
The applicant’s appeal from the original trial, Journigan v. State, 223 Md. 405, 164 A. 2d 896 (1960), did not raise the issues of probable cause for his arrest or the introduction of evidence as a result thereof. In any event, the applicant’s trial and final conviction was prior to Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961), at a time when illegally seized evidence was admissible in a trial on a charge which was a felony. Nance v. Warden, 239 Md. 404, 211 A. 2d 739 (1965).
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.2d 578, 240 Md. 707, 1965 Md. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/journigan-v-warden-md-1965.