Journigan v. Warden

213 A.2d 578, 240 Md. 707, 1965 Md. LEXIS 492
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 18, 1965·No. App. No. 14·Published

Opinion

PER Curiam.

For the reasons stated by Judge Powers in the lower court in his memorandum and order of February 25, 1964, the application of Haywood Earl Journigan for leave to appeal from the order denying' him post conviction relief from imprisonment for robbery with a deadly weapon is hereby denied.

The applicant’s appeal from the original trial, Journigan v. State, 223 Md. 405, 164 A. 2d 896 (1960), did not raise the issues of probable cause for his arrest or the introduction of evidence as a result thereof. In any event, the applicant’s trial and final conviction was prior to Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 (1961), at a time when illegally seized evidence was admissible in a trial on a charge which was a felony. Nance v. Warden, 239 Md. 404, 211 A. 2d 739 (1965).

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Journigan v. Warden, 213 A.2d 578, 240 Md. 707, 1965 Md. LEXIS 492 (Md. 1965).

213 A.2d 578 (Journigan v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mapp v. Ohio
367 U.S. 643 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Journigan v. State
164 A.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)
Nance v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
211 A.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)