Jouda v. Kaplan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Jouda v. Kaplan

84 N.Y.S. 863

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 863 (Jouda v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jouda v. Kaplan, 84 N.Y.S. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The action is for goods sold and delivered, and the pleadings are in writing. The answer does not deny any of the allegations of the complaint, but sets up a strictly affirmation refusal, alleging an unexpired term of credit. It appears from admissions in the answer that at the time the judgment herein was rendered the [864]*864time of credit had expired as to two sales, though not as to the third. Nevertheless the defendant admitted, under oath, in a proceeding before United States Commissioners Sheilds, his indebtedness in the amount sued for, and when levy was made herein by the sheriff he promptly paid the judgment. The appeal is therefore without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The action is for goods sold and delivered, and the pleadings are in writing. The answer does not deny any of the allegations of the complaint, but sets up a strictly affirmation refusal, alleging an unexpired term of credit. It appears from admissions in the answer that at the time the judgment herein was rendered the [864]*864time of credit had expired as to two sales, though not as to the third. Nevertheless the defendant admitted, under oath, in a proceeding before United States Commissioners Sheilds, his indebtedness in the amount sued for, and when levy was made herein by the sheriff he promptly paid the judgment. The appeal is therefore without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jouda-v-kaplan-nyappterm-1903.