Jou v. Schmidt
This text of Jou v. Schmidt (Jou v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29868 04-MAY-2012 NO. SCWC-29868 02:18 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
EMERSON M.F. JOU, M.D., Petitioner/Provider-Appellant,
vs.
J.P. SCHMIDT, Insurance Commissioner, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, State of Hawai#i, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee,
DAI-TOKYO ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29868; CIV. NO. 05-1-1053)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kim, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court
of Appeals, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp.
2008); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
36(b)(1) (2008),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Provider-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 30,
2012, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application
pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (“Within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal
or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is
extended in accordance with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 4, 2012.
Stephen M. Shaw for /s/ Paula A. Nakayama petitioner/provider-appellant on the application /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Glenn J. Kim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jou v. Schmidt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jou-v-schmidt-haw-2012.