Josue Calvillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2013
Docket11-71746
StatusUnpublished

This text of Josue Calvillo v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Josue Calvillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Josue Calvillo v. Eric Holder, Jr., (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSUE ESTRADA CALVILLO, No. 11-71746

Petitioner, Agency No. A029-567-302

v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 18, 2013 **

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Josue Estrada Calvillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for

review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Calvillo’s challenges to the original agency

proceedings in 1995 because this petition is not timely as to those proceedings.

See Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 557 n.6 (9th Cir. 2004).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Calvillo’s untimely motion

to reopen because he did not establish changed circumstances in Guatemala to

qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

2 11-71746

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kui Rong Ma v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
361 F.3d 553 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Josue Calvillo v. Eric Holder, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/josue-calvillo-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.