Jost v. Jost
796 S.W.2d 31, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 1990 WL 113569
Opinion
The husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify a separation agreement. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jost v. Jost, 796 S.W.2d 31, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 1990 WL 113569 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
796 S.W.2d 31 (Jost v. Jost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.