Josserand v. Coe

150 F.2d 159, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 180, 65 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 563, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 18, 1945
DocketNo. 8784
StatusPublished

This text of 150 F.2d 159 (Josserand v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Josserand v. Coe, 150 F.2d 159, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 180, 65 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 563, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529 (D.D.C. 1945).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves claims for reissuance of a patent previously granted relating to a drive-in theater. These claims were rejected, first, by the Patent Office and, again, by the District Court in a R.S. Section 49151 proceeding. One was rejected on the ground that it was not properly supported by the applicant’s disclosure; the others, for the reason that they were either [1] the same as or broader than claims which he had abandoned in his previous application or [2] unpatentable over the prior art. We agree that appellant is not entitled to a patent upon these claims, for the reasons stated.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 63
35 U.S.C. § 63

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 F.2d 159, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 180, 65 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 563, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/josserand-v-coe-dcd-1945.