Josserand v. Coe

150 F.2d 159, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 180, 65 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 563, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 18, 1945·No. No. 8784·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves claims for reissuance of a patent previously granted relating to a drive-in theater. These claims were rejected, first, by the Patent Office and, again, by the District Court in a R.S. Section 49151 proceeding. One was rejected on the ground that it was not properly supported by the applicant’s disclosure; the others, for the reason that they were either [1] the same as or broader than claims which he had abandoned in his previous application or [2] unpatentable over the prior art. We agree that appellant is not entitled to a patent upon these claims, for the reasons stated.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Josserand v. Coe, 150 F.2d 159, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 180, 65 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 563, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529 (D.D.C. 1945).

150 F.2d 159 (Josserand v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 63
35 U.S.C. § 63