Joslyn v. Sappington

1 Tenn. 222
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedNovember 6, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Tenn. 222 (Joslyn v. Sappington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joslyn v. Sappington, 1 Tenn. 222 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1806).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An appeal will not lie agreeably to our law, in ordinary cases, unless from a final judgment. Had the plea been sustained there might have been an appeal, for then the plaintiff would have been out of court, but as the case stood, the defendant should have answered over, and upon the case coming here after final judgment, we would then look into the interlocutory proceedings. If an appeal was allowed upon intermediate proceedings, we might have several in the same cause. If the cause were to be taken up here, and the plea in abatement not supported, we should have to send the cause back to the county court for trial, and upon the final judgment it might come here again.

The appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dyanna Wilson v. City of Memphis
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2015
Andrews v. Fifth Third Bank
228 S.W.3d 102 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2007)
Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Miller
491 S.W.2d 85 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joslyn-v-sappington-tennsuperct-1806.