Joshua Wright v. Brendan F. Murphy, Judge

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 18, 2025
DocketA26E0027
StatusPublished

This text of Joshua Wright v. Brendan F. Murphy, Judge (Joshua Wright v. Brendan F. Murphy, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joshua Wright v. Brendan F. Murphy, Judge, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 18, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26E0027. JOSHUA WRIGHT v. BRENDAN F. MURPHY, JUDGE.

In this pro se petition for emergency relief and a writ of prohibition, Joshua Wright asks this Court to vacate certain orders issued by the Superior Court of Cobb County, prohibit the superior court from taking further action, issue a child custody ruling, and refer certain court officials to various authorities for investigation. We are not authorized to grant such relief. First, prohibition will not lie where there is another legal remedy, and exhaustion of other legal remedies will be required before a writ of prohibition may be sought.1 Second, while Georgia’s appellate courts have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus or prohibition,“it will be an ‘extremely rare’ circumstance that would require a party to seek a writ of mandamus [or prohibition] in [an appellate court] in the first instance[.]”2 Indeed, we are authorized to issue such relief “only in matters related to an appeal or impending appeal, when necessary in aid of appellate jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate appellate court judgments.”3 The present case

1 See Gordon v. Whitwell, 278 Ga. 708, 709-710 (607 SE2d 542) (2004) (“Although [the petitioner] could have exercised available legal remedies to challenge the juvenile court orders, she elected instead to seek a writ of prohibition. Dismissal of a writ of prohibition is authorized if the court has ascertained that the petitioner was not deprived of all legal remedies.”) (citation omitted). 2 Arnold v. Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 335 (1) n.6 (914 SE2d 311) (2025). 3 Id. at 335 (1). is not one of those extremely rare circumstances. Accordingly, Wright’s petition for emergency relief and a writ of prohibition is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/18/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. Whitwell
607 S.E.2d 542 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Arnold v. Alexander
914 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joshua Wright v. Brendan F. Murphy, Judge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-wright-v-brendan-f-murphy-judge-gactapp-2025.