JOSHUA NEGRON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

257 So. 3d 1226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 28, 2018
Docket17-2446
StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 3d 1226 (JOSHUA NEGRON v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JOSHUA NEGRON v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 257 So. 3d 1226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOSHUA MELVIN NEGRON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2446 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

Robert P. Harris of Robert Harris Law Firm, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Joshua Melvin Negron challenges the revocation of his probation and

resulting sentence of twenty-four months in prison for the offense of fleeing or eluding a

law enforcement officer with lights and sirens activated. We affirm without discussion the trial court's decision to revoke probation and remand only for entry of a second

corrected revocation order.

The trial court entered a revocation order and a corrected revocation

order. Negron argues, and the State acknowledges, that the corrected revocation order

contains errors that require further correction. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court

to enter a second corrected revocation order that omits the condition five violations that

were never alleged or mentioned at the evidentiary hearing, includes the condition ten

violation that the trial court found, and reflects that the violations were found after an

evidentiary hearing. See Jones v. State, 221 So. 3d 736, 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)

(remanding for entry of a revocation order conforming to the oral pronouncement of the

condition violated); Hamilton v. State, 128 So. 3d 177, 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)

(remanding to correct revocation order that incorrectly stated that the probationer

admitted to the violation when the trial court had conducted a revocation hearing).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

LUCAS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
221 So. 3d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Hamilton v. State
128 So. 3d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 So. 3d 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-negron-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.