JOSHUA LUCAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

247 So. 3d 23
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 27, 2018
Docket17-3747
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 247 So. 3d 23 (JOSHUA LUCAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JOSHUA LUCAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 247 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSHUA LUCAS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3747

[June 27, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 10-19938CF10A, 12-8310CF10A, 12-13531CF10A, 12-18023CF10A, 13-1209CF10A and 13-2570CF10A.

Joshua Lucas, Bonifay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Joshua Lucas appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Lucas claims that 1) the oral pronouncement of his sentence conflicts with the charging document; 2) the trial court erred in preparing only one scoresheet for six pending cases; and 3) the trial court erred by scoring prior convictions under the additional offense heading. We affirm on issues 2 and 3 without further comment. As to the first issue, the State concedes that the disposition order should be corrected to reflect that appellant was charged with burglary of an unoccupied dwelling under section 810.02(3)(b), Florida Statutes.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence but remand with directions that the scrivener’s error be corrected in the disposition order. Appellant’s presence is not required for this correction. See Sweeney v. State, 138 So. 3d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error in appellant’s sentencing. GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FREDERICK BERNARD THOMAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
HAROLD HUNT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 So. 3d 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-lucas-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.