Joshua Lee Dixon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 2, 2015
Docket05-15-00357-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Joshua Lee Dixon v. State (Joshua Lee Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joshua Lee Dixon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order entered July 1, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00357-CR

JOSHUA LEE DIXON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-82812-2014

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due June 17, 2015, but has not been filed. On June 15, 2015,

appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss the appeal. Because the motion was not signed by

counsel, on June 16, 2015, the Court sent counsel a copy of the motion with a letter directing

counsel to sign and return the motion within ten days if he concurred with appellant’s decision.

To date, counsel has neither returned a signed copy of the motion nor communicated with the

Court regarding the appeal. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding

the following.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to pursue the appeal. If appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect and no further findings are required.  If the trial court determines that appellant does desire to pursue the appeal, the trial court shall determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings regarding whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joshua Lee Dixon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-lee-dixon-v-state-texapp-2015.