Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd
This text of Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd (Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 31, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00959-CV ——————————— JOSHUA JUMBO, Appellant V. RITTENHOUSE SRO LTD., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1054776
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Joshua Jumbo, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil
Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district
Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified
that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-jumbo-v-rittenhouse-sro-ltd-texapp-2015.