Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 2015
Docket01-14-00959-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd (Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00959-CV ——————————— JOSHUA JUMBO, Appellant V. RITTENHOUSE SRO LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1054776

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Joshua Jumbo, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified

that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-jumbo-v-rittenhouse-sro-ltd-texapp-2015.