Joshua James Ozuna v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 2015
Docket13-14-00734-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Joshua James Ozuna v. State (Joshua James Ozuna v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joshua James Ozuna v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00734-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOSHUA JAMES OZUNA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law of Kerr County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Joshua James Ozuna, filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his

conviction for possession of marijuana.1 The record currently before the Court fails to

include a certification of appellant’s right to appeal.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.). Based upon information provided by the district clerk’s office, a certification has

not yet been entered by the trial court. Accordingly, this matter is ABATED and

REMANDED to the trial court for entry of a certification of the appellant’s right to appeal.

On remand, the trial court shall immediately issue notice of a hearing and accordingly

conduct a hearing addressing the foregoing matter. We further direct that, after

conducting the hearing, the trial court certify whether appellant has the right of appeal.

The trial court's certification, and any orders it enters, shall be included in a supplemental

clerk's record. The trial court is directed to cause the supplemental clerk's record to be

filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order. Should the

trial court require more time to comply with the directions of this Court, it shall request an

extension prior to the expiration of this deadline.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this The 30th day of March, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 73.001
Texas GV § 73.001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joshua James Ozuna v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-james-ozuna-v-state-texapp-2015.