Joshua Hoyle & Sons, Ltd. v. Shipley-Hollins Co.
222 A.D. 747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1927·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.; Finch and Proskauer, JJ., dissent on the authority of Lange v. Schile (111 App. Div. 613) and Segelken v. Meyer (94 N. Y. 473).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joshua Hoyle & Sons, Ltd. v. Shipley-Hollins Co., 222 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
222 A.D. 747 (Joshua Hoyle & Sons, Ltd. v. Shipley-Hollins Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Segelken v. . Meyer
94 N.Y. 473 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Lange v. Schile
111 A.D. 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)