Joshua Hendy Machine Works v. Pacific Cable Co.

33 P. 403, 24 Or. 152, 1893 Ore. LEXIS 95
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to foreclose an alleged mechanics’ lien. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff has a lien upon lots 8,4,5, and 6, in block 1, in Market Street Addition to the City of Portland. To prove this allegation, plaintiff introduced in evidence, against defendant’s objection, a notice claiming a lien upon lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, in block 1, in Carter’s Addition to the City of Portland, which is a different parcel of land. This is a fatal variance between the allegation and the proof. The notice of lien does not describe the property set forth in the complaint.

The decree is eeveesed and the complaint dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joshua Hendy Machine Works v. Pacific Cable Co., 33 P. 403, 24 Or. 152, 1893 Ore. LEXIS 95 (Or. 1893).

33 P. 403 (Joshua Hendy Machine Works v. Pacific Cable Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrisburg Lumber Co. v. Washburn
44 P. 390 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1896)