Joshua Frost v. Ron Van Boening

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joshua Frost v. Ron Van Boening. Read the opinion of the Court — 757 F.3d 910
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2013·No. 11-35114·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2013 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

JOSHUA JAMES FROST, No. 11-35114

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00725-TSZ

v. ORDER RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joshua Frost v. Ron Van Boening, (9th Cir. 2013).

Joshua Frost v. Ron Van Boening (Joshua Frost v. Ron Van Boening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.