Joshua Dale Davis v. Cross County Sheriff’s Office, et al.

E.D. Arkansas

Joshua Dale Davis v. Cross County Sheriff’s Office, et al.

DecidedOctober 24, 2025

Docket3:25-cv-00212

StatusUnknown

This text of Joshua Dale Davis v. Cross County Sheriff’s Office, et al. (Joshua Dale Davis v. Cross County Sheriff’s Office, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joshua Dale Davis v. Cross County Sheriff’s Office, et al., (E.D. Ark. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA DALE DAVIS PLAINTIFF # 038849 v. CASE NO. 3:25-CV-00212-BSM-JTK CROSS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney’s recommended disposition [Doc. No. 4] is adopted. First, Joshua Davis’s claim against the Cross County Detention Center is dismissed without prejudice because detention centers are not “persons” subject to suit under under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See De La Garza v. Kandiyohi Cty. Jail, Corr. Inst., 18 F. App’x 436, 437 (8th Cir. 2001). Second, Davis’s

claims against defendants in their official capacities are dismissed without prejudice because he has not pled that a policy, practice, or deliberately indifferent failure to train or supervise caused his injuries. See Corwin v. City of Independence, Missouri, 829 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir. 2016) (citing Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978)). Third, Davis’s retaliation claim is dismissed without prejudice because he fails to show his unrelated lawsuit

caused retaliatory animus. Davis’s excessive force claims against Jail Guards Allan Doe and Chris Doe may proceed. The clerk is directed to update the case style to reflect the dismissal of Cross County Sheriff's Office and add Allan Doe and Chris Doe as defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2025.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA DALE DAVIS PLAINTIFF # 038849 v. CASE NO. 3:25-CV-00212-BSM-JTK CROSS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After careful review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney’s recommended disposition [Doc. No. 4] is adopted. First, Joshua Davis’s claim against the Cross County Detention Center is dismissed without prejudice because detention centers are not “persons” subject to suit under under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See De La Garza v. Kandiyohi Cty. Jail, Corr. Inst., 18 F. App’x 436, 437 (8th Cir. 2001). Second, Davis’s

claims against defendants in their official capacities are dismissed without prejudice because he has not pled that a policy, practice, or deliberately indifferent failure to train or supervise caused his injuries. See Corwin v. City of Independence, Missouri, 829 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir. 2016) (citing Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978)). Third, Davis’s retaliation claim is dismissed without prejudice because he fails to show his unrelated lawsuit

caused retaliatory animus. Davis’s excessive force claims against Jail Guards Allan Doe and Chris Doe may proceed. The clerk is directed to update the case style to reflect the dismissal of Cross County Sheriff's Office and add Allan Doe and Chris Doe as defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2025.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Joshua Dale Davis v. Cross County Sheriff’s Office, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshua-dale-davis-v-cross-county-sheriffs-office-et-al-ared-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack