Joshlin v. Home Security Mortgage Corp.

178 So. 2d 784, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3924
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 20, 1965
DocketNo. 10410
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 So. 2d 784 (Joshlin v. Home Security Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joshlin v. Home Security Mortgage Corp., 178 So. 2d 784, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3924 (La. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

BOLIN, Judge.

L. C. Taylor’s dwelling, while insured for fire and extended coverage by Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company, had the floors damaged by water. The insured’s policy contained a loss-payable clause to Taylor’s mortgagee, Home Security Mortgage Corporation. Taylor contracted with plaintiff, Joshlin, to repair the floors and submitted to the insurance company a proof of loss reflecting the net liability of the latter as $216. Neither liability nor the amount are questioned by the insurer. By numerous pleadings, deemed irrelevant to the issues before this court, the question arose as to whether Joshlin, as the floor repairman, had a legal right to compel the insurer, over the objection of the mortgagee, to pay him the sum of $216. From judgment in favor of the mortgagee, third party petitioner, and rejecting Joshlin’s demands he appeals.

The insurance policy contained the following provision:

“Mortgage Clause: Subject to the provisions of the mortgage clause attached hereto, loss, if any on building items, shall be payable to: Home Security Mortgage Corp., Trustee for the rightful holders of note, Louisiana Bank Bldg., Shreveport, La.”

There is no contention the insurance company contracted with Joshlin in any way. On the contrary, Taylor was the only person who had any dealings with Joshlin. The judgment of the lower court reserved Josh-lin’s rights against Taylor. Since the insurer had no contractual agreement with Josh-lin, and since Taylor has not appealed, it follows the judgment appealed from is correct.

The judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walter v. Marine Office of America
537 F.2d 89 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Ahto Walter v. Marine Office Of America
537 F.2d 89 (Third Circuit, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 So. 2d 784, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshlin-v-home-security-mortgage-corp-lactapp-1965.