Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 870 F.3d 282
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 25, 2017·No. 17-1056·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT September 19, 2017

No. 17-1056

JOSHIM UDDIN,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

(Agency No. 208-059-346)

Present: GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ and RENDELL, Circuit Judges 1. Motion by Respondent to Amend Opinion dated September 6, 2017.

Respectfully,

Clerk/tmm

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing motion is granted. The opinion at page 20, first paragraph, last sentence which reads:

“As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were authorized by party leaders, we review that determination for clear error.” is amended to read instead:

“As long as the agency finds as a matter of fact that the allegedly terroristic acts were authorized by party leaders, we will accept that finding if supported by substantial evidence.”

An amended opinion will be issued. As this change does not alter the Court's disposition, judgment entered by the Court will not be amended.

By the Court,

s/MARJORIE O. RENDELL

Circuit Judge

Dated: September 25, 2017 tmm/cc: Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, Esq. Daniel I. Smulow, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States, (3d Cir. 2017).

Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States (Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.