Joshi v. BASHITI

202 S.W.3d 611, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 993, 2006 WL 1788468
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 2006
DocketED 86837
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 S.W.3d 611 (Joshi v. BASHITI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joshi v. BASHITI, 202 S.W.3d 611, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 993, 2006 WL 1788468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keshav S. Joshi (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition and, in the alternative, granting summary judgment in favor of Mohammed Bashiti, Et al. Appellant raises five allegations of error by the trial court.

We have reviewed all of the briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. There is no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McEntire v. State
202 S.W.3d 611 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 S.W.3d 611, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 993, 2006 WL 1788468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joshi-v-bashiti-moctapp-2006.