Josh Liam Thiago Express, LLC v. Estifanos Woldehawariat

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 15, 2024
Docket14-24-00096-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Josh Liam Thiago Express, LLC v. Estifanos Woldehawariat (Josh Liam Thiago Express, LLC v. Estifanos Woldehawariat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Josh Liam Thiago Express, LLC v. Estifanos Woldehawariat, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 15, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00096-CV

JOSH LIAM THIAGO EXPRESS, LLC, Appellant V. ESTIFANOS WOLDEHAWARIAT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023-59182

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 9, 2023. On April 9, 2024, the clerk for the 269th District Court of Harris County Texas, provided notice that the trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial. The district clerk attached a copy of the trial court’s order granting appellant’s motion for new trial signed February 8, 2024 and amended on February 22, 2024.

When a motion for new trial is granted, the case is reinstated on the trial court’s docket as if no judgment had been signed. Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005) (“[T]he trial court wiped the slate clean when it granted [the appellant’s] motion for new trial; it is as though the court’s first order granting summary judgment never existed . . . .”). Therefore, the issues presented in this appeal are moot, and we lack appellate jurisdiction.

On August 12, 2024, the clerk of this court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response within 10 days showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal. No response was filed. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care System
160 S.W.3d 559 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Josh Liam Thiago Express, LLC v. Estifanos Woldehawariat, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/josh-liam-thiago-express-llc-v-estifanos-woldehawariat-texapp-2024.