Josey v. George

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Josey v. George

146 S.E. 506, 39 Ga. App. 120, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 211

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1929

Docket19307

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 146 S.E. 506 (Josey v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Josey v. George, 146 S.E. 506, 39 Ga. App. 120, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. “A purchaser of a negotiable note, although with notice of an equity as between the maker and the original payee, is protected in his title, if he purchases the note from one who previously purchased it from the original payee “without notice of any infirmity in the note.” Wade v. Elliott, 11 Ga. App. 646 (2) (75 S. E. 989) ; Weil v. Carswell, 119 Ga. 873 (1) (47 S. E. 217); 8 Corpus Juris, 466, § 685-D.

2. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant ease, the trial judge properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

3. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial show error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI