Josey v. George

146 S.E. 506, 39 Ga. App. 120, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 211
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1929·No. 19307·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. “A purchaser of a negotiable note, although with notice of an equity as between the maker and the original payee, is protected in his title, if he purchases the note from one who previously purchased it from the original payee “without notice of any infirmity in the note.” Wade v. Elliott, 11 Ga. App. 646 (2) (75 S. E. 989) ; Weil v. Carswell, 119 Ga. 873 (1) (47 S. E. 217); 8 Corpus Juris, 466, § 685-D.

2. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant ease, the trial judge properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

3. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial show error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Josey v. George, 146 S.E. 506, 39 Ga. App. 120, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 211 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

146 S.E. 506 (Josey v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nottingham v. West
27 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Veal v. Jenkins
197 S.E. 328 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)